Hi, On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Evan Ward wrote: > On 10/23/2013 10:38 AM, MAISONOBE Luc wrote: >> The current implementation of solid tides is usable and got some >> validation, but it is not completely finished yet. It needs some >> polishing and adding a few effects. Did you have the opportunity to >> chek it against some other reference results yet? > I'll see if I can make the comparison. No promises though. :) > I found some time to compare Orekit's propagator and tide modeling with our heritage orbit determination system, OCEAN. The comparison work is currently in progress. A colleague here at the Lab and I plan to submit the results as a paper to the 2014 Astrodynamics Specialists Conference [1]. What is the best way to cite Orekit and all of the contributors? Best Regards, Evan [1] http://www.space-flight.org/docs/2014_astro/2014_astro.html
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature