[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orekit Developers] NRL MSISE




On 09/22/2016 10:49 AM, pascal parraud wrote:
Hi Evan,

Le 21/09/2016 à 14:43, Evan Ward a écrit :
Pascal,

Great work with the NRL MSISE atmosphere. I think it adds a significant capability to the library. I do have a couple questions about the implementation.
Thanks, I also think NRLMSISE-00 is a significant addition as this model can compute density down to the ground, unlike most others atmosphere models. By the way, I'm also working on the JB2008 model in order to give more up-to-date capabilities to Orekit for calculating drag force.
The comment on NRLMSISE00InputParameters.getDailyFlux(date) states it 
returns the flux for the previous day. Does this mean 24 hours prior 
to the supplied date?
Well, I'm not sure about that (I just copy the comments from the legacy code) and I didn't find in the literature any clear explanation about F10.7 input data, an other issue being how to get 81 days average F10.7 if you need values in the future ?
All information/experience about these data is welcome ...
I looked at the Fortran version, but that didn't have any information 
beyond what you've reproduced. I guess one could use predicted flux 
values to compute the 81 day average, but I wouldn't recommend it as 
using predicted flux values results in degraded orbit predictions. [1]
[1] http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2016-5258

Several classes related to atmospheres changed packages, which is a 
change to classes that a user would commonly use in a backward 
incompatible way. Is the next Orekit release going to be 9.0? I think 
the reorganization is a good thing. I just want to make sure people 
were not expecting a 8.1 release.
Luc and I were wondering about that, as it looks like a minor change (but backward incompatible, you're right) in a minor release (if we don't add others features). What do you prefer: being strict on release naming rules or being a bit flexible for minor changes ?
When it comes down to it a number is just a number, but I would prefer 
that if the first number is the same then the new version is a drop in 
replacement for the previous version.
Best Regards,
Evan

Best Regards,
Evan
Best Regards,
Pascal