[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orekit Developers] User-provided filtering of input data
- To: orekit-developers@orekit.org
- Subject: Re: [Orekit Developers] User-provided filtering of input data
- From: Hank Grabowski <hank@applieddefense.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:13:48 -0400
- Authentication-results: kepler.orekit.org; dkim=pass reason="2048-bit key; insecure key" header.d=applieddefense-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@applieddefense-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=AWfft5R2; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy); dkim-atps=neutral
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=applieddefense-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Cqbg8cvLPaLDfRCBVNsqRY1yNr1eTygFzTR+NOdEQ/E=; b=AWfft5R27hSTvDW04tCLLX4PM42fzoazigyFOVPukP50BhrqBHTg/hjVK535s1F6vW yk2HaxIX+Svm0pNkTzR7qhG41KuKFGWbNXurKvsv6qJf/zuesZO5aYgAehavKYL5Uey4 D8uzJeJBC2tO02valeSVSey5OJoNE3RsRQxf9izsfLJqPm7Tuk0bZtG35cM/d3FIu57I 1VzGcxLrkLOX335ad/Xu8Bbol8MSJ4BGTe8Aj1jPpnt5kX77xtK9wHRNJmF/bgj9dZj4 wJ/k07GV9VBWIL9TIpCu/Wae0PVcafGUlBidZdzYZGPR9FGKt3u2MriYWG5+egs+2SFC htMg==
- In-reply-to: <20170425112910.Horde.QIJF4DkBx1P536URFCUZBA1@messagerie.c-s.fr>
- References: <20170425112910.Horde.QIJF4DkBx1P536URFCUZBA1@messagerie.c-s.fr>
I'm with Evan on this. Increasing the flexibility of the library is always good in theory but if there aren't resources to do that then I think your work around is more than reasonable. I definitely do not want to require massive dependencies for an edge case...